<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Jazz Session #146: Erik Deutsch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thejazzsession.com/2010/02/25/the-jazz-session-146-erik-deutsch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thejazzsession.com/2010/02/25/the-jazz-session-146-erik-deutsch/</link>
	<description>The online jazz interview show hosted by Jason Crane.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 16:59:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Anderson</title>
		<link>http://thejazzsession.com/2010/02/25/the-jazz-session-146-erik-deutsch/comment-page-1/#comment-15262</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejazzsession.com/?p=1812#comment-15262</guid>
		<description>I really loved the music - as you say it does have a cinematic feel to it.  It is unfortunate that the audio quality of Erik&#039;s side was pretty abysmal ... I feel like I missed or had to guess at ~1/3 of what he was saying ... :(

But you guys brought up the whole &#039;what is the so-called Jazz audience&#039; thing, and I think it makes a lot of sense.  I mean, I am not young, and grew up in a rock-dominated era.  

And really, if you set the age of 13 for &#039;growing up in an era&#039;, and demarcate the &#039;rock domination&#039; era as the arrival of the Beatles in &#039;64, then anyone born in 1951 or later has really had to deal with rock-type music as a dominant force throughout their lives.  That means that the real &#039;jazz-only&#039; purebreds have to be at least 60 years old.  Not to downplay them as an audience, but it seems we should be looking at the reality that most folks listening to jazz today are going to have a massively hybridized view of music.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really loved the music &#8211; as you say it does have a cinematic feel to it.  It is unfortunate that the audio quality of Erik&#8217;s side was pretty abysmal &#8230; I feel like I missed or had to guess at ~1/3 of what he was saying &#8230; :(</p>
<p>But you guys brought up the whole &#8216;what is the so-called Jazz audience&#8217; thing, and I think it makes a lot of sense.  I mean, I am not young, and grew up in a rock-dominated era.  </p>
<p>And really, if you set the age of 13 for &#8216;growing up in an era&#8217;, and demarcate the &#8216;rock domination&#8217; era as the arrival of the Beatles in &#8217;64, then anyone born in 1951 or later has really had to deal with rock-type music as a dominant force throughout their lives.  That means that the real &#8216;jazz-only&#8217; purebreds have to be at least 60 years old.  Not to downplay them as an audience, but it seems we should be looking at the reality that most folks listening to jazz today are going to have a massively hybridized view of music.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

